Item
Haack, Susan | |
2011 May 24 | |
Susan Haack, University of Miami, organizes her lecture in the following points: 1. A pragmatic preamble: how legal concepts evolve. 2. A brief history: evidence of RR>2 becomes a test for specific causation. 3. Epistemological interlude: why RR>2 is neither necessary nor sufficient. 4. Practical postscript: why better epistemology would be better policy 2087.mp4 susan-haack.mp3 |
|
video/H263 audio/mpeg |
|
Haack, S. (2011). Risky business: statistical proof of individual causation. A ’Grup de recerca de Filosofia del Dret’. Girona: Universitat. [Consulta 3 juny 2011]. Disponible a: http://hdl.handle.net/10256.1/2087 | |
http://hdl.handle.net/10256.1/2087 | |
eng | |
Universitat de Girona. Departament de Dret Privat | |
Grup de recerca de Filosofia del Dret | |
Aquest document està subjecte a una llicència Creative Commons: Reconeixement – No comercial – Compartir igual (by-nc-sa) | |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/es/deed.ca | |
Dret -- Filosofia -- Congressos
Law -- Philosophy -- Congresses |
|
Risky business: statistical proof of individual causation | |
info:eu-repo/semantics/lecture | |
DUGiMedia |