DUGi: Item | DUGiMedia - Legal probabilism: an epistemological dissent

Item

Author:	Haack, Susan
Date:	2011 May 26
Abstract:	Susan Haack, University of Miami, organizes her lecture in the following points: 1. Standards of proof are best understood as degrees of warrant. 2. Degrees of warrant aren’t mathematical probabilities. 3. Commonwealth v. Sacco and Vanzetti: epistemology trumps probability theory. 4. People v. Collins: epistemology trumps probability again 2090.mp4 2090.mp3
Format:	video/H263 audio/mpeg
Citation:	Haack, S. (2011). Legal probabilism: an epistemological dissent. A ’Standards of proof and scientific evidence’. Girona: Universitat. [Consulta 3 juny 2011]. Disponible a: http://hdl.handle.net/10256.1/2090
Document access:	http://hdl.handle.net/10256.1/2090
Language:	eng
Publisher:	Universitat de Girona. Grup de Recerca en Filosofia del Dret
Collection:	Standards of proof and scientific evidence
Rights:	Aquest document està subjecte a una llicència Creative Commons: Reconeixement – No comercial – Compartir igual (by-nc-sa)
Rights URI:	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/es/deed.ca
Subject:	Prova (Dret) -- Congressos Dret -- Filosofia -- Congressos Evidence (Law) -- Congresses Law -- Philosophy -- Congresses
Title:	Legal probabilism: an epistemological dissent
Type:	info:eu-repo/semantics/lecture
Repository:	DUGiMedia