Item


Legal probabilism: an epistemological dissent

Susan Haack, University of Miami, organizes her lecture in the following points: 1. Standards of proof are best understood as degrees of warrant. 2. Degrees of warrant aren’t mathematical probabilities. 3. Commonwealth v. Sacco and Vanzetti: epistemology trumps probability theory. 4. People v. Collins: epistemology trumps probability again

Universitat de Girona. Grup de Recerca en Filosofia del Dret

Author: Haack, Susan
Date: 2011 May 26
Abstract: Susan Haack, University of Miami, organizes her lecture in the following points: 1. Standards of proof are best understood as degrees of warrant. 2. Degrees of warrant aren’t mathematical probabilities. 3. Commonwealth v. Sacco and Vanzetti: epistemology trumps probability theory. 4. People v. Collins: epistemology trumps probability again
Format: video/H263
audio/mpeg
Citation: Haack, S. (2011). Legal probabilism: an epistemological dissent. A ’Standards of proof and scientific evidence’. Girona: Universitat. [Consulta 3 juny 2011]. Disponible a: http://hdl.handle.net/10256.1/2090
Document access: http://hdl.handle.net/10256.1/2090
Language: eng
Publisher: Universitat de Girona. Grup de Recerca en Filosofia del Dret
Collection: Standards of proof and scientific evidence
Rights: Aquest document està subjecte a una llicència Creative Commons: Reconeixement – No comercial – Compartir igual (by-nc-sa)
Rights URI: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/es/deed.ca
Subject: Prova (Dret) -- Congressos
Evidence (Law) -- Congresses
Dret -- Filosofia -- Congressos
Law -- Philosophy -- Congresses
Title: Legal probabilism: an epistemological dissent
Type: info:eu-repo/semantics/lecture
Repository: DUGiMedia

Subjects

Authors


Warning: Unknown: write failed: No space left on device (28) in Unknown on line 0

Warning: Unknown: Failed to write session data (files). Please verify that the current setting of session.save_path is correct (/var/lib/php5) in Unknown on line 0