Ítem
| Roberts, Paul | |
| 27 maig 2011 | |
|
Dr. Paul Roberts, University of Nottingham, organizes his lecture in the following points: Introduction: sources of anxiety and dispute; 1. Case histories. 2. Institutional context and normative framework. a) Apellate review of criminal convenctions, b) Error of law, c) Trial by jury, d) Precedent, law and fact. 3. Enduring epistemic challenges (science, experts and forensic proof). a) Medical evidence in forensic context, b) Scientific uncertainty and disagreement between experts, c) Conflicts of experts authority and witness credibility. Conclusion: doing justice to expert evidence and scientific proof 2096.mp4 2096.mp3 |
|
|
video/H263 audio/mpeg |
|
| Roberts, P. (2011). Was the baby shaken? Evidence, expertise and legal epistemology in english criminal trials. A ’Standards of proof and scientific evidence’. Girona: Universitat. [Consulta 6 juny 2011]. Disponible a: http://hdl.handle.net/10256.1/2096 | |
| http://hdl.handle.net/10256.1/2096 | |
| eng | |
| Universitat de Girona. Grup de Recerca en Filosofia del Dret | |
| Standards of proof and scientific evidence | |
| Aquest document està subjecte a una llicència Creative Commons: Reconeixement – No comercial – Compartir igual (by-nc-sa) | |
| http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/es/deed.ca | |
|
Prova (Dret) -- Congressos
Dret -- Filosofia -- Congressos Evidence (Law) -- Congresses Law -- Philosophy -- Congresses |
|
| Was the baby shaken? Evidence, expertise and legal epistemology in english criminal trials | |
| info:eu-repo/semantics/lecture | |
| DUGiMedia |
