Ítem


Frugal Algorithm Selection

Erdem Kus, from the University of Sant Andrews in Scotland, tells us that when solving decision and optimisation problems, many competing algorithms (model and solver choices) have complementary strengths. Typically, there is no single algorithm that works well for all instances of a problem. Automated algorithm selection has been shown to work very well for choosing a suitable algorithm for a given instance. However, the cost of training can be prohibitively large due to running candidate algorithms on a representative set of training instances. In this work, we explore reducing this cost by choosing a subset of the training instances on which to train. We approach this problem in three ways: using active learning to decide based on prediction uncertainty, augmenting the algorithm predictors with a timeout predictor, and collecting training data using a progressively increasing timeout. We evaluate combinations of these approaches on six datasets from ASLib and present the reduction in labelling cost achieved by each option

7762.mp4 7762.mp3

Universitat de Girona. Departament d’Informàtica, Matemàtica Aplicada i Estadística

Altres contribucions: Universitat de Girona. Departament d’Informàtica, Matemàtica Aplicada i Estadística
Autor: Kuş, Erdem
Akgün, Özgür
Dang, Nguyen
Miguel, Ian
Data: 3 setembre 2024
Resum: Erdem Kus, from the University of Sant Andrews in Scotland, tells us that when solving decision and optimisation problems, many competing algorithms (model and solver choices) have complementary strengths. Typically, there is no single algorithm that works well for all instances of a problem. Automated algorithm selection has been shown to work very well for choosing a suitable algorithm for a given instance. However, the cost of training can be prohibitively large due to running candidate algorithms on a representative set of training instances. In this work, we explore reducing this cost by choosing a subset of the training instances on which to train. We approach this problem in three ways: using active learning to decide based on prediction uncertainty, augmenting the algorithm predictors with a timeout predictor, and collecting training data using a progressively increasing timeout. We evaluate combinations of these approaches on six datasets from ASLib and present the reduction in labelling cost achieved by each option
7762.mp4 7762.mp3
Format: audio/mpeg
video/mp4
Accés al document: http://hdl.handle.net/10256.1/7762
Llenguatge: eng
Editor: Universitat de Girona. Departament d’Informàtica, Matemàtica Aplicada i Estadística
Col·lecció: 30th International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming
Drets: Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International
URI Drets: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Matèria: Programació per restriccions (Informàtica) -- Congressos
Constraint programming (Computer science) -- Congresses
Títol: Frugal Algorithm Selection
Tipus: info:eu-repo/semantics/lecture
Repositori: DUGiMedia

Matèries

Autors