Item


Cost-benefit of three different methods for studying Mediterranean rocky benthic assemblages

Here we compare the applicability, the information provided and the cost-benefit of three sampling methods usually used in the study of rocky benthic assemblages. For comparative purposes, sampling was performed seasonally and along a depth gradient (0-50 m) in the Cabrera Archipelago (western Mediterranean). The destructive scraping (collection) method was the least cost-effective but provided the best qualitative and quantitative information. The in situ visual method was the most time-effective but provided low levels of taxonomic resolution and its accuracy decreased with depth due to the increasing difficulty of recognizing species in situ due to nitrogen narcosis, reduced light and cold. The photoquadrat method showed intermediate values of cost-effectiveness and information but was not suitable for multilayered assemblages, as it only accounted for the overstory. A canonical correspondence analysis showed that depth was highlighted as the main environmental gradient (16.0% of variance) by the three methods. However, differences due to the sampling method (7.9% of variance) were greater than differences due to temporal variability (5.8% of variance), suggesting that the three methods are valid but their selection has to be carefully assessed in relation to the targeted assemblages and the specific goals of each study

Scientia Marina, 2017, vol. 81, p. 129-138

Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cient铆ficas (CSIC)

Author: Sant, Nat脿lia
Chappuis, Eglantine
Rodr铆guez Prieto, Concepci贸
Real, Montserrat
Ballesteros i Segarra, Enric
Date: 2017 January 10
Abstract: Here we compare the applicability, the information provided and the cost-benefit of three sampling methods usually used in the study of rocky benthic assemblages. For comparative purposes, sampling was performed seasonally and along a depth gradient (0-50 m) in the Cabrera Archipelago (western Mediterranean). The destructive scraping (collection) method was the least cost-effective but provided the best qualitative and quantitative information. The in situ visual method was the most time-effective but provided low levels of taxonomic resolution and its accuracy decreased with depth due to the increasing difficulty of recognizing species in situ due to nitrogen narcosis, reduced light and cold. The photoquadrat method showed intermediate values of cost-effectiveness and information but was not suitable for multilayered assemblages, as it only accounted for the overstory. A canonical correspondence analysis showed that depth was highlighted as the main environmental gradient (16.0% of variance) by the three methods. However, differences due to the sampling method (7.9% of variance) were greater than differences due to temporal variability (5.8% of variance), suggesting that the three methods are valid but their selection has to be carefully assessed in relation to the targeted assemblages and the specific goals of each study
Format: application/pdf
ISSN: 0214-8358 (versi贸 paper)
1886-8134 (versi贸 electr貌nica)
Document access: http://hdl.handle.net/10256/14255
Language: eng
Publisher: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cient铆ficas (CSIC)
Collection: Reproducci贸 digital del document publicat a: http://dx.doi.org/10.3989/scimar.04463.04A
Articles publicats (D-CCAA)
Is part of: Scientia Marina, 2017, vol. 81, p. 129-138
Rights: Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Spain
Rights URI: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/es/
Subject: Bentos -- Balears -- Cabrera
Benthos -- Balearic Islands -- Cabrera
Bentos -- Mostreig
Benthos -- Sampling
Title: Cost-benefit of three different methods for studying Mediterranean rocky benthic assemblages
Type: info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Repository: DUGiDocs

Subjects

Authors