Ítem
| Pardo, Michael S. | |
| 1 juliol 2020 | |
| This paper discusses Ronald Allen’s article, Naturalized Epistemology and the Law of Evidence Revisited, and reflects on how epistemology can contribute to our understanding of the evidentiary proof process. I first situate Allen’s critique of recent philosophical scholarship, distinguishing between general theoretical accounts of proof (including the theory that Allen and I have defended), on one hand, and the applications of specific epistemological concepts or issues to law, on the other. I then present a methodological picture that diverges in some respects from the one that emerges from Allen’s critique. In discussing this alternative methodological picture, I explain how epistemology can contribute to legal evidence and proof while avoiding the problems that Allen identifies | |
| application/pdf | |
| http://hdl.handle.net/10256/19281 | |
| eng | |
|
Marcial Pons Universitat de Girona. Càtedra de Cultura Jurídica |
|
|
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i2.22484 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/2660-4515 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/eissn/2604-6202 |
|
| Reconeixement 4.0 Internacional | |
| http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 | |
| Naturalized Epistemology and the Law of Evidence: Methodological Reflections | |
| info:eu-repo/semantics/article | |
| DUGiDocs |
