Item


Measuring Subcompositional Incoherence

Subcompositional coherence is a fundamental property of Aitchison’s approach to compositional data analysis, and is the principal justification for using ratios of components. For dimension reduction of a matrix of compositional data, either an unweighted (Aitchison & Greenacre 2002) or weighted (Greenacre & Lewi 2009; Greenacre 2010a: chapter 7) form of log-ratio analysis can be used, and these are both subcompositionally coherent. Many alternative methods that might be applied to compositional data are subcompositionally incoherent, but some can be judged to be less incoherent than others. In other words, either for a particular data set, or in general, a method might actually be quite subcompositionally “robust” in that its results for a subcomposition are quite close to its results for the same components as part of a full composition. So we propose that lack of subcompositional coherence, that is subcompositional incoherence, can be measured in an attempt to evaluate whether any given technique is close enough, for all practical purposes, to being subcompositionally coherent. This opens up the field to alternative methods, which might be better suited to cope with problems such as data zeros and outliers, while being only slightly incoherent

Universitat de Girona. Departament d’Informàtica i Matemàtica Aplicada

Other contributions: Universitat de Girona. Departament d’Informàtica i Matemàtica Aplicada
Author: Greenacre, Michael J.
Date: 2018 June 5
Abstract: Subcompositional coherence is a fundamental property of Aitchison’s approach to compositional data analysis, and is the principal justification for using ratios of components. For dimension reduction of a matrix of compositional data, either an unweighted (Aitchison & Greenacre 2002) or weighted (Greenacre & Lewi 2009; Greenacre 2010a: chapter 7) form of log-ratio analysis can be used, and these are both subcompositionally coherent. Many alternative methods that might be applied to compositional data are subcompositionally incoherent, but some can be judged to be less incoherent than others. In other words, either for a particular data set, or in general, a method might actually be quite subcompositionally “robust” in that its results for a subcomposition are quite close to its results for the same components as part of a full composition. So we propose that lack of subcompositional coherence, that is subcompositional incoherence, can be measured in an attempt to evaluate whether any given technique is close enough, for all practical purposes, to being subcompositionally coherent. This opens up the field to alternative methods, which might be better suited to cope with problems such as data zeros and outliers, while being only slightly incoherent
Document access: http://hdl.handle.net/2072/319421
Language: eng
Publisher: Universitat de Girona. Departament d’Informàtica i Matemàtica Aplicada
Rights: Tots els drets reservats
Subject: Estadística matemàtica -- Congressos
Mathematical statistics -- Congresses
Anàlisi multivariable -- Congressos
Multivariate analysis -- Congresses
Title: Measuring Subcompositional Incoherence
Type: info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
Repository: Recercat

Subjects

Authors


Warning: Unknown: write failed: No space left on device (28) in Unknown on line 0

Warning: Unknown: Failed to write session data (files). Please verify that the current setting of session.save_path is correct (/var/lib/php5) in Unknown on line 0